Best Prospeo, Datagma, & Blitz alternatives ← back to blog
~ / blog / best-prospeo-datagma-blitz-alternatives

Best Prospeo, Datagma, & Blitz alternatives

TL;DR

The best alternative depends on what you're replacing and why. Quick version:

  • If you want verified emails via API or MCP at a flat rate, use MoltSets. It covers the email finding Prospeo, Datagma, and Blitz do, starting at $27/mo with no per-lookup credits. Mobiles come from a fixed-price add-on.

  • If you want the highest mobile hit rate, use FullEnrich. It runs a waterfall across 20+ providers and only charges when it finds something.

  • If you want a cheap, API-first credit model, use LeadMagic. Mobiles cost 5 credits, half what Prospeo charges.

  • If you want verified emails for cold email, use Findymail. It's built around catch-all verification and plugs into Instantly, Smartlead, and Lemlist.

  • If you only need business emails from a domain, use Hunter.io. It has a permanent free plan.

  • If you prospect on LinkedIn and sell into Europe, use Kaspr. Its Chrome extension is strongest on European phone numbers.

  • If you want quick reveals on LinkedIn in the US, use Lusha. Fast, simple, and priced per reveal.

What Prospeo, Datagma & Blitz do, and why teams look elsewhere

All three find verified emails and mobile numbers. They differ in how you access them and how you pay, and that's usually what drives a switch.

Prospeo is an email and mobile finder with a 41-filter B2B search database, a Chrome extension for LinkedIn, an API, and an MCP server. It's accurate on single lookups. Teams move because pricing is per user: $49, $99, or $249 per user per month (2,000, 5,000, or 15,000 credits), 25% off yearly, and unused monthly credits don't roll over. A three-person team on Growth pays $297/mo, and a mobile costs 10 credits.

Datagma looks up emails and mobiles in real time and is known for phone accuracy, especially from LinkedIn profiles. It sells fixed monthly allowances: $49/mo buys 100 phones and 3,000 emails, $99 buys 250 and 7,500, and $249 buys 750 and 22,500, with 20% off yearly. Teams move because phone volume is capped per plan, extra seats cost $5/user/mo, and it's a single source with no fallback when a record is missing.

Blitz is a flat-rate B2B data API: unlimited people search, company search, emails, and phones within your plan. Teams move because entry is steep ($499/mo before you get emails, $599/mo for phones), phones are US-only, and there's no UI for people who don't write code.

What to look for in an alternative

  • Pricing model. Flat-rate if your volume is steady or growing; credits if you enrich occasionally. Check what a mobile costs relative to an email, since that ratio (5x to 10x in credits) drives most bills.

  • Seats. Per-user pricing (Prospeo, Kaspr) and seat-capped plans (Datagma, Lusha) can add up for teams with several people and modest volume. Pooled plans (MoltSets, Blitz, FullEnrich, LeadMagic) avoid this problem.

  • Access. API or MCP if enrichment runs inside Clay, Claude, n8n, or your own code; a Chrome extension if reps enrich one LinkedIn profile at a time.

  • Phone coverage by region. US-only (Blitz), non-EU only (Findymail), or EU-strong (Kaspr) matters more than a total record count.

  • Pay on success. Most tools here charge only for valid results. Confirm bulk uploads follow the same rule.

Prospeo, Datagma & Blitz alternatives at a glance

Tool

What it is

Pricing model

Entry price

Email vs mobile cost

Access

Best for

MoltSets

API and MCP-first enrichment, no dashboard

Flat rate + phone add-on

Free (1k records), then $27/mo

Emails unlimited; mobiles from a fixed token pack

API, MCP, Clay, Claude, and more

Flat-rate AI  workflows

FullEnrich

Waterfall across 20+ providers

Credits, pay on success

Pro from €55/mo (1,000 credits)

1 / 10 credits

Web app, API

Mobile hit rate

LeadMagic

API-first email and mobile finder

Credits, pay on success

$99/mo (5,000 credits)

1 / 5 credits

API, MCP, CLI, Clay

Cheap API credits

Findymail

Verified email finder for cold email

Credits, pay on success

$99/mo (5,000 credits)

1 / 10 credits (non-EU phones)

Web app, extension, API

Cold email deliverability

Hunter.io

Domain email search and verification

Credits

Free (50), then $49/mo

Emails only

Web app, extension, API

Email-only finding

Kaspr

LinkedIn contact extension

Per user, split credits

Free, then $65/user/mo 

Separate phone credit pool

Chrome extension, API on Business

EU phone prospecting

Lusha

LinkedIn contact extension

Plans with bundled seats

Free (40/mo), then $37.45/mo (annual)

1 / 5 credits

Chrome extension, API from Pro

US LinkedIn reveals

What's the best flat-rate alternative to Prospeo, Datagma, and Blitz?

MoltSets. It's an API and MCP-first enrichment provider that runs inside claude.ai, Clay, Claude Code, Codex, or your own code instead of a separate dashboard. It returns verified business and personal emails with a risk score, real-time carrier-verified mobile numbers, people and company search, email validation, and reverse email lookup.

Best for: Teams that enrich inside AI or automation workflows and want a bill that doesn't grow with every lookup.

Pricing: Free for 1,000 records, then $27/mo for unlimited enrichment records (5,000 requests every five hours, fair use limits apply). Higher tiers at $97, $397, and $997/mo raise the rate limit. Mobiles come from a Phone Token add-on on paid plans: $27/mo for 180 mobiles, $97 for 646, or $197 for 1,313 (one token per mobile). Unlimited plans are subject to a fair use policy.

Compared with the three: No seats, unlike Prospeo. No 30-credit phone lookups, unlike Datagma. The same flat-rate model as Blitz, but emails start at $27/mo instead of $499/mo, and personal emails are included.

Limitations: There's no standalone prospecting dashboard or LinkedIn extension, so reps who enrich one profile at a time will miss it. Mobile volume is capped by your token pack, not unlimited.

Verdict: Use MoltSets if you want flat-rate email enrichment inside Claude, Clay, or code. Skip it if your team works from a Chrome extension.

What's the best Datagma alternative for mobile numbers?

FullEnrich. It runs a waterfall across 20+ data providers, querying each in sequence until it finds a verified email or mobile. You use it through a web app, CSV upload, API, or MCP server.

Best for: Teams whose outreach depends on mobile numbers and who want the best find rate without managing several providers.

Pricing: Free trial with 50 credits. Pro starts at €55/mo for 1,000 credits (€0.055 each), with a slider up to 100,000+. A work email costs 1 credit, a personal email 3, and a mobile 10. Credits are only spent on verified finds and roll over for 3 months on monthly billing, 12 on yearly. Users are unlimited.

Compared with Datagma: One credit pool you can spend on emails or phones in any mix, where Datagma fixes a phone allowance per plan, plus a waterfall fallback where Datagma relies on one source.

Limitations: Mobiles cost 10x an email. 

Verdict: Use FullEnrich if phone hit rate is the priority. Skip it if you mostly need emails at volume, where flat-rate tools cost less.

What's the best Blitz alternative with pay-per-result pricing?

LeadMagic. It's an API-first email and mobile finder with 15+ endpoints, a CLI, and a hosted MCP server for Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT. It integrates natively with Clay, Smartlead, and Instantly.

Best for: Technical teams that want API access like Blitz but don't have the volume to justify a $499+ flat plan.

Pricing: Essential is $99/mo for 5,000 credits, Growth $249 for 20,000, Professional $499 for 50,000, and Ultimate $849 for 100,000. A valid email costs 1 credit and a valid mobile 5. Failed lookups are free, and monthly plans bank up to two months of unused credits.

Compared with Blitz: You pay per result instead of a flat fee, which is cheaper at low volume. Phones aren't limited to the US. Compared with Prospeo, mobiles cost half as many credits.

Limitations: There's no free trial. You choose a paid plan at signup, with a refund window of 14 days on the first payment.

Verdict: Use LeadMagic for pay-per-result API enrichment with cheap mobiles. Skip it if your volume is high enough that a flat rate wins.

What's the best Prospeo alternative for cold email?

Findymail. It finds and verifies emails in one step, with its own catch-all verification. You use it through a web app, Chrome extension, CSV upload, or API, and it pushes lists straight to Instantly, Smartlead, and Lemlist.

Best for: Outbound teams and agencies whose main risk is bounces and domain reputation.

Pricing: Starter is $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 verifier credits, on a slider up to 100,000+. An email costs 1 credit and a phone 10. You only pay for verified results, yearly billing gives 2 months free, and there's a free trial.

Compared with Prospeo: Credits are pooled rather than priced per user, and the product is built around deliverability rather than search.

Limitations: Phone finding excludes EU contacts for GDPR reasons, and there's no permanent free plan.

Verdict: Use Findymail if your pipeline is cold email. Skip it if you call European prospects.

What's the best Prospeo alternative if you only need emails?

Hunter.io. It finds and verifies business emails at the domain level. Domain Search returns public addresses for a company with confidence scores, Email Finder predicts an individual's address from a name and domain, and the verifier flags addresses as valid, invalid, accept-all, or risky.

Best for: Teams that need business emails and nothing else.

Pricing: A free plan with 50 credits a month; paid plans start at $49/mo for 2,000 credits. Finding an email costs 1 credit and verifying one costs 0.5. Unlimited users share one credit pool.

Compared with Prospeo: No per-user pricing and a permanent free plan, but no phone numbers at all.

Limitations: Coverage is weaker for small companies with little public web presence, where searches can return nothing or generic inboxes like info@.

Verdict: Use Hunter.io when email finding is the whole job. Pair it with another tool if you need mobiles.

What's the best Datagma alternative for European phone numbers?

Kaspr. It's a Chrome extension, owned by Cognism, that reveals phone numbers and emails from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter Lite profiles.

Best for: Reps prospecting on LinkedIn who call into Europe, where coverage is reported to be stronger than in the US.

Pricing: Free plan with 15 B2B email, 5 phone, and 5 direct email credits a month. Starter is $65/mo with 100 phone credits and 5 direct email credits a year. Business is $99mo with 200 of each. Both paid plans include unlimited B2B email credits.

Compared with Datagma: Both split phone and email allowances, but Kaspr includes unlimited B2B email credits and works inside Sales Navigator. The trade-off is per-user pricing.

Limitations: Exports are capped even on paid plans (12,000 a year on Starter, 30,000 on Business), and the free plan has no API.

Verdict: Use Kaspr for LinkedIn-based phone prospecting in Europe. Skip it for bulk or API enrichment.

What's the best Prospeo alternative for LinkedIn reveals in the US?

Lusha. It's a Chrome extension that reveals emails and direct phone numbers while you browse LinkedIn, company websites, or your CRM.

Best for: Individual US-focused reps who want contact details on the spot.

Pricing: Free plan with 40 credits a month. Starter is $37.45/mo billed yearly for 4,800 credits a year and one seat. Pro is $52.45/mo for 7,200 credits, two seats, and API access. Premium is $299.95/mo for 40,800 credits and five seats. An email reveal costs 1 credit and a phone reveal 5.

Compared with Prospeo and Datagma: Phones cost half of Prospeo's credit rate, and plans bundle seats instead of charging per user.

Limitations: Phone reveals drain credits fast (Starter's 400 credits a month cover 80 phones), and the API only starts on Pro.

Verdict: Use Lusha for lightweight LinkedIn prospecting. Skip it for high-volume calling or API workflows.

Which one replaces which

  • Prospeo (email finding) → Findymail. Pooled credits instead of per-user pricing, and verification built for cold email.

  • Datagma (enrichment) → FullEnrich. One credit pool for emails and phones in any mix, plus a waterfall where Datagma relies on one source.

  • Blitz (enrichment/automation) → MoltSets. The same flat-rate API model, with emails from $27/mo instead of $499/mo.

If you want one tool to cover all three jobs through an API or MCP, that's MoltSets.

Honorable mentions

  • Clay isn't a data provider so much as a workbench for running several at once. Most tools above, MoltSets and LeadMagic included, run inside Clay tables.

  • Apollo.io bundles a contact database with sequencing and dialing. It fits if you want one platform rather than a data layer. See our Apollo alternatives comparison.

  • ZoomInfo suits enterprise teams on annual contracts. See our ZoomInfo alternatives comparison.

For API-only options, see our roundup of the best B2B data enrichment APIs.

Is MoltSets right for you?

We're biased, but MoltSets is the right replacement if:

  • You enrich inside Claude, Clay, Claude Code, Codex, or your own scripts, not a dashboard.

  • You want a monthly bill that stays the same whether you run 1,000 lookups or 100,000.

  • You liked Blitz's flat-rate model but not its $499 entry point.

  • You want personal emails and risk scores alongside business emails.

It's not right if your reps prospect one LinkedIn profile at a time from a Chrome extension. You can start free with 1,000 records.

Frequently asked questions

What's the best alternative to Prospeo?

MoltSets for flat-rate API enrichment, Findymail for cold email, and Hunter.io if you only need emails. Prospeo prices per user and charges 10 credits per mobile, so the right swap depends on whether seats or phones drive your bill.

What's a good alternative to Datagma?

FullEnrich is the closest replacement for phone-first enrichment: one credit pool covers emails and phones in any mix instead of a fixed phone allowance, and a waterfall covers records one source misses. Kaspr fits if you look up European phone numbers from LinkedIn.

What can I use instead of Blitz for enrichment?

MoltSets keeps Blitz's flat-rate model but starts at $27/mo instead of $499/mo for emails. LeadMagic suits lower volumes, charging per valid result with mobiles at 5 credits.

Is there a flat-rate alternative to these tools?

Yes. MoltSets charges $27/mo for unlimited enrichment records, with mobiles from a fixed monthly token add-on. Blitz is also flat-rate but starts at $399/mo and needs $499/mo for emails.

Does MoltSets replace Prospeo, Datagma, or Blitz?

For API and MCP enrichment of emails and mobiles, yes. It doesn't replace Prospeo's or Datagma's Chrome extensions, so teams that enrich one LinkedIn profile at a time should look at Kaspr or Lusha.

Which alternative is cheapest for mobile numbers?

LeadMagic and Lusha charge 5 credits per mobile, against 10 for Prospeo, FullEnrich, and Findymail. Datagma sells phones as a fixed allowance, 100 a month on its $49 plan. At steady volume, a fixed monthly phone pack (MoltSets) or plan (Blitz Full, US only) is easier to budget.

Which alternatives have a free plan?

MoltSets (1,000 records), Prospeo (100 credits a month), Datagma (90 emails and 3 phones a month), Hunter.io (50 credits a month), Lusha (40 credits a month), and Kaspr have free plans. FullEnrich (50 credits) and Findymail offer free trials. LeadMagic currently has no free trial.

Do these tools charge for failed lookups?

Mostly no. MoltSets, FullEnrich, LeadMagic, and Findymail charge only for valid results, and Blitz counts only results delivered. Check how bulk CSV uploads are billed before running a large list.

Support Docs Developer Docs Skills Library Terms of Service Privacy Policy Compliance